Satisfaction is the performance of the agreement by the promisor, so that if the agreement is implemented, the agreement would have been respected. So if Thelma Louise actually gives the beach house and Louise accepts the beach house to pay Thelma`s debts, there is satisfaction with her agreement. In the absence of such an intention, the partial payment will have only a relief effect of the amount paid and the creditor is entitled to maintain an action in recovery of the balance of his debt. In order to determine the intent of the parties, it is necessary to examine the language of the order of satisfaction and release taking into account the circumstances that existed at the time of the concentration. The agreement is the agreement on the new terms of the contract, and satisfaction is compliance with these conditions in accordance with the agreement. If there is consistency and satisfaction and the performance (or satisfaction) has been executed, all previous claims regarding the case are extinguished. Whether or not an agreement replaces the old contract is generally a matter of intent for the parties when they have entered into the agreement. Agreement and satisfaction are the payment of unseated debt. For example, a contractor is responsible for building a garage for an owner for 35,000 $US.
The contract required $17,500 prior to construction, us$10,000 in various construction phases and a final payment of $7,500 at completion. Once completed, the owner of the house complained of a lower quality of work and refused to make the final payment. After a mutual agreement, the owner accepted $4000 as a full payment. A new contract was created through offer, acceptance and consideration. The idea is that for a saving of $3,500, the owner abandons what is rightfully his, a well-built garage. The owner gives up his right at full price to avoid the suit for a lower performance. If the agreement and satisfaction have arrived, the owner has waived his right to bring a lower-quality action, and the owner has waived his right to sue for the full $7,500, which is due under the original contract. An agreement and satisfaction are to be distinguished from Derentis. A discharge is the abandonment of a right that can be granted free of charge (free) or against insufficient consideration, while an agreement and satisfaction is the cancellation or debt by accepting a payment that is considered a full satisfaction Holman v. Simborg, 152 Ill App.3d 453, 456 (Fig. Ct.
1. Dist. Therefore, reflection is not a necessary element for liberation, but for harmony and satisfaction. If the contractual debt cannot be settled or executed, an agreement can be reached to settle the debt in a new way. Correspondence and satisfaction are generally a matter of state law and are generally defined as an agreement for the completion of an application in which the parties agree to give and accept another benefit, generally less than is necessary or due. Any claim based on an explicit or tacit contract can be agreed and met. See our article on contracts. Since an agreement is seen as a new agreement that replaces the old one, coherence and satisfaction must contain all the essential elements of a treaty. Compliance and satisfaction is a concept of contract law that generally applies to obtaining an exemption from the debt obligation.
Debt negotiations can lead to agreement and satisfaction. Take, for example, the bank and Company A. Company A has a credit contract with the bank that puts pressure on the balance sheet. The bank is working with Company A and the initial credit agreement is being revised. The new terms could allow Company A to make more minor payments, repay debt at a lower interest rate, repay less than the original commitment or other agreement.